THANKSGIVING HAM: TMF...INR
How quickly can the Mandela Effect work?
Tiffany Gomas has claimed that right around 2023-07-02 she was recorded asserting,
"That Motherfucker back there is not real!"
Within a few days, the hashed initialism which spun off of that was TMFINR and it seems no one noticed the gross omission (BT) which had occurred. NOBODY searched for the correct initialism. EVERYONE flocked to the misdirection.
So the Mandela Effect took off before the truth had a name? Why does that matter? It matters because if anyone wants to look under the surface layer, the OMISSION is going to slow the process of hunting for multiple entendres.
TMFINR - That Mother Fucker ... Is Not Real
Translation: "Ok, so there's someone or something weird on the plane, and maybe we'll never know the details. Let's shift our attention back to the messenger, her career, her outfit, and maybe her swimsuit collection."
Then again, maybe that's the architect's intention. Maybe the omission was the clue. Maybe by pissing off the eye for detail, the architect can capture the desired audience.
TMF...INR
TMFBTINR - That Mother Fucker Back There Is Not Real
Now that we've reconstituted the correct initialism, let's play with it. Let's go literal with "Mother Fucker". Who fucks their mom? Let's go chronological with "Back There". Who used to fuck their mom back in the day? Oedipus? We already know it's a myth, but let's refresh our memory on the subject and the allegorical formula with the search below.
Very interesting, but already universally affirmed as a myth, so the "something there" demonstrates little framework from which we can build.
Any other notable Mother-Fuckers in history we can consider? What about Ham? He fucked his mom. That angered Noah, right? Anything resembling a foundation for narrative relevance there? How does, "is not real" apply to this story?
Oh wow! Think of the implication. What a great right cross of another entendre to land over a year after the left jab.
Any discussions suddenly trending? What can we learn from this?
Curse of Ham digested, I'm now happy to call this a win for finding a new & meaningful layer. While this ruling is not solely tied to Tiffany's legs puffing through her bursting jeans, I also don't exactly feel my observation is "hamstrung" by the indentations of butchers twine. Perhaps we can call it circumferential evidence, which is still evidence.
What if we unbind this?
Having admitted I'm content with the #TheCurseOfHamIsUnbound, if I now close my eyes and say, "The Curse of Ham" 5-times quickly, fuzzy homophonia wakes up and offers something additional that is a bit of a reach, but something I had already repeatedly considered, independent of this endeavor.
Yes, it seems like a reach, but you can make your own decision after a few quick clips of the show itself. If there's such a thing as an uncanny peak, this might emerge from the range.
But, before we go, what would Megyn Kelly have to do with any of this?
Why does everything seem like it's connected to something else?
- Special thanks to Juan Franqui, aka KnucklesLawnCare for the original video.
#drunkonaplane 📐vs #drunkonanairplane 🛩️ ?
SHARE WITH A FRIEND!
